You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.<

LG Ray vs O2 XDA Comet

Compare recorded specifications, size and practical differences.

LG Ray

LG Ray

Replace Ray
Remove Ray
+ Add a third phone

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

  • WeightXDA Comet: 13 g lighterXDA Comet: 145 g · Ray: 158 g
  • WidthXDA Comet: 18.4 mm narrowerXDA Comet: 58 mm · Ray: 76.4 mm
  • Screen diagonalXDA Comet: 2.8 in smaller diagonalXDA Comet: 2.7 in · Ray: 5.5 in
  • DepthRay: 9.7 mm thinnerRay: 9.3 mm · XDA Comet: 19 mm
  • HeightXDA Comet: 46.5 mm shorterXDA Comet: 106 mm · Ray: 152.5 mm
  • Release year2015 / 2007Ray: 2015 · XDA Comet: 2007

Physical size

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

Front
Ray: 152.5 × 76.4 mm 1 XDA Comet: 106 × 58 mm 2
Side
Ray: 152.5 × 9.3 mm 1 XDA Comet: 106 × 19 mm 2
  1. 1. Ray
    Height
    152.5 mm+46.5 mm versus XDA Comet
    Width
    76.4 mm+18.4 mm versus XDA Comet
    Depth
    9.3 mm
    Weight
    158 g
  2. 2. XDA Comet
    Height
    106 mm
    Width
    58 mm
    Depth
    19 mm+9.7 mm versus Ray
    Weight
    145 g
Weight

Bars start at zero and share a scale within this chart.

  1. 1. Ray158 g

    +13 g versus XDA Comet

  2. 2. XDA Comet145 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

Screen size
Ray: 5.5 in, 16:9, About 83.4 cm² rectangular area 1 XDA Comet: 2.7 in, 4:3, About 22.6 cm² rectangular area 2
  1. 1. Ray 5.5 in · 16:9 About 83.4 cm² rectangular area
  2. 2. XDA Comet 2.7 in · 4:3 About 22.6 cm² rectangular area

Ray has approximately 269.4% more rectangular screen area than XDA Comet.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Recorded RAM by storage capacity and phone
StorageRayXDA Comet
16 GB 1 GB RAM Unknown
XDA Comet: Original memory entry

64 MB RAM · 1 GB ROM

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

1. Ray

NFC
Unknown
Headphone jack
Yes
Memory card support
See details microSD (dedicated slot)

2. XDA Comet

NFC
Unknown
Headphone jack
No
Memory card support
See details miniSD

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Specifications

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

1. Ray2. XDA Comet

Everyday essentials
Everyday essentials
SpecificationRayXDA Comet
Dimensions (HxWxD)
  • 152.5 Х 76.4 Х 9.3 mm
  • 106 Х 58 Х 19 mm
Weight
  • 158 g
  • 145 g
Technology
  • IPS LCD
  • TFT
Screen size
  • 5.5" inch
  • 2.7" inch
Screen resolution
  • 720 x 1280 px
  • 240 x 320 px
Internal memoryRecorded storage / RAM variants. Entries are alternatives, not a combined maximum. Ambiguous formats stay as recorded.
  • 16 GB
  • 1 GB RAM
  • 64 MB RAM
  • 1 GB ROM
Memory card support
  • microSD (dedicated slot)
  • miniSD
BatteryCapacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.
  • 3000 mAh
  • Removable Li-Ion
  • 0 mAh,
Operating system OS
  • Android 5.1 (Lollipop)
  • Microsoft Windows Mobile 6.0 Professional
Chipset
  • Mediatek MT6592M (28 nm)
Unknown
Headphone jack
  • Yes
  • No
Display
Display
SpecificationRayXDA Comet
Touchscreen
  • capacitive touchscreen
  • resistive touchscreen
Display colors
  • 16M
  • 65K
Screen area
  • 83.4 cm2
  • 22.6 cm2
Screen format
  • 16:9 (height:width)
  • 4:3 (height:width)
Screen to body ratio
  • 71.6%
  • 36.7%
PPI /points per inch/
  • 267 PPI
  • 148 PPI
Camera and Video
Camera and Video
SpecificationRayXDA Comet
Rear camera, main
  • 13 MP
  • Single
  • 2 MP
  • Single
Camera specs
  • 13 MP
  • AF
  • 2 MP
Functions
  • LED flash
  • LED flash
Video
  • 1080p@30fps
  • Yes
Front camera, selfie
  • 8 MP
  • Single
  • 0.3 MP
  • Single
Specifications
  • 8 MP
  • VGA videocall camera
Performance
Performance
SpecificationRayXDA Comet
Processor CPU
  • Octa-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A7
  • Intel XScale PXA 270 620 MHz
Graphics processor GPU
  • Mali-450MP4
Unknown
General specs
General specs
SpecificationRayXDA Comet
Release date
  • 2015
  • November
  • 2007
  • September
Colors
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Titan Black
  • Silver
Historical recorded priceLegacy catalogue value; date unknown. Not a current offer.
  • 190 EUR
Unknown
Battery life Unknown
  • Stand by time- Up to 200 h Talking time- Up to 6 h
Communication and Connectivity
Communication and Connectivity
SpecificationRayXDA Comet
SIM card
  • Single SIM (Micro-SIM)Dual SIM (Micro-SIM
  • dual stand-by)
  • Mini-SIM
Network
  • Show all network frequencies: -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only)
  • Show all network frequencies: -2G - GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900
Speed
  • HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps
  • HSPA
GPRS
  • Yes
  • Class 10
Edge
  • Yes
  • Yes
Wi-Fi
  • Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
  • hotspot
  • Wi-Fi 802.11b/g
GPS
  • Yes
  • with A-GPS
  • No
USB
  • microUSB 2.0
  • miniUSB
Bluetooth
  • 4.0
  • A2DP
  • 1.2
Music and Audio
Music and Audio
SpecificationRayXDA Comet
Radio
  • No
  • Stereo FM radio
  • RDS
Others Unknown
  • Handwriting recognition
Other features
Other features
SpecificationRayXDA Comet
Dop
  • Sensors Accelerometer
  • proximity - Also known as LG Zone in Latin America
  • Infrared port - Pocket Office -Voice memo -MP3/AAC player

Similar comparisons