Meizu 16Xs vs Nokia E65

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightE65: 50 g lighterE65: 115 g · 16Xs: 165 g
• WidthE65: 25.4 mm narrowerE65: 49 mm · 16Xs: 74.4 mm
• Screen diagonalE65: 4 in smaller diagonalE65: 2.2 in · 16Xs: 6.2 in
• Rear camera layoutTriple / Single16Xs: Triple · E65: Single
• Depth16Xs: 7.2 mm thinner16Xs: 8.3 mm · E65: 15.5 mm
• HeightE65: 47 mm shorterE65: 105 mm · 16Xs: 152 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 16Xs

   Height

   152 mm+47 mm versus E65

   Width

   74.4 mm+25.4 mm versus E65

   Depth

   8.3 mm

   Weight

   165 g

2. 2. E65

   Height

   105 mm

   Width

   49 mm

   Depth

   15.5 mm+7.2 mm versus 16Xs

   Weight

   115 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. 16Xs 6.2 in · 18.5:9 About 97.6 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. E65 2.2 in · 4:3 About 15 cm² rectangular area

16Xs has approximately 550.9% more rectangular screen area than E65.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.