Meizu m3e vs TECNO Camon CX

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Camon CX: 22 g lighter

  m3e:

  172 g

  Camon CX:

  150 g

• Chipset

  m3e:

  Mediatek MT6755 Helio P10 (28 nm)

  Camon CX:

  Mediatek MT6750T (28 nm)

• Depth

  Camon CX: 2.3 mm thinner

  m3e:

  7.9 mm

  Camon CX:

  5.6 mm

• Release year

  m3e:

  2016

  Camon CX:

  2017

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. m3e

   Height:

   153.6 mm

   Width:

   75.8 mm

   Depth:

   7.9 mm +2.3 mm versus Camon CX

2. 2. Camon CX

   Height:

   152.8 mm

   Width:

   75.8 mm

   Depth:

   5.6 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. m3e

   Screen diagonal:

   5.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   83.4 cm²

2. 2. Camon CX

   Screen diagonal:

   5.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   83.4 cm²

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.