Micromax A80 vs Nokia C1

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthA80: 7.4 mm narrowerA80: 64 mm · C1: 71.4 mm
• Screen diagonalA80: 1.7 in smaller diagonalA80: 3.75 in · C1: 5.45 in
• DepthC1: 4.8 mm thinnerC1: 8.7 mm · A80: 13.5 mm
• HeightA80: 18.1 mm shorterA80: 129.5 mm · C1: 147.6 mm
• Release year2012 / 2019A80: 2012 · C1: 2019

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. A80

   Height

   129.5 mm

   Width

   64 mm

   Depth

   13.5 mm+4.8 mm versus C1

   Weight

   Unknown

2. 2. C1

   Height

   147.6 mm+18.1 mm versus A80

   Width

   71.4 mm+7.4 mm versus A80

   Depth

   8.7 mm

   Weight

   155 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. A80 3.75 in · 3:2 About 41.9 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. C1 5.45 in · 18:9 About 76.7 cm² rectangular area

C1 has approximately 83.1% more rectangular screen area than A80.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.