Micromax Bolt A35 vs Samsung Galaxy M Pro B7800

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Bolt A35: 19.4 g lighter

  Bolt A35:

  89 g

  Galaxy M Pro B7800:

  108.4 g

• Width

  Bolt A35: 2 mm narrower

  Bolt A35:

  64 mm

  Galaxy M Pro B7800:

  66 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Galaxy M Pro B7800: 1.34 in smaller diagonal

  Bolt A35:

  4 in

  Galaxy M Pro B7800:

  2.66 in

• Depth

  Galaxy M Pro B7800: 1.6 mm thinner

  Bolt A35:

  11.6 mm

  Galaxy M Pro B7800:

  10 mm

• Height

  Galaxy M Pro B7800: 10.5 mm shorter

  Bolt A35:

  124 mm

  Galaxy M Pro B7800:

  113.5 mm

• Release year

  Bolt A35:

  2013

  Galaxy M Pro B7800:

  2011

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Bolt A35

   Height:

   124 mm +10.5 mm versus Galaxy M Pro B7800

   Width:

   64 mm

   Depth:

   11.6 mm +1.6 mm versus Galaxy M Pro B7800

2. 2. Galaxy M Pro B7800

   Height:

   113.5 mm

   Width:

   66 mm +2 mm versus Bolt A35

   Depth:

   10 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Bolt A35

   Screen diagonal:

   4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   45.5 cm²

2. 2. Galaxy M Pro B7800

   Screen diagonal:

   2.66 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   3:2

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   21.1 cm²

Bolt A35 has approximately 116.2% more rectangular screen area than Galaxy M Pro B7800.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.