Mitac MIO 8870 vs Philips 968

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  MIO 8870: 8 g lighter

  MIO 8870:

  120 g

  968:

  128 g

• Depth

  MIO 8870: 4 mm thinner

  MIO 8870:

  21 mm

  968:

  25 mm

• Height

  968: 15 mm shorter

  MIO 8870:

  110 mm

  968:

  95 mm

• Release year

  MIO 8870:

  2004

  968:

  2005

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. MIO 8870

   Height:

   110 mm +15 mm versus 968

   Width:

   49 mm

   Depth:

   21 mm

2. 2. 968

   Height:

   95 mm

   Width:

   48.7 mm

   Depth:

   25 mm +4 mm versus MIO 8870

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. MIO 8870

   MIO 8870: Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting.

2. 2. 968

   968: Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.