Mitac MIO A702 vs Nokia E50

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightE50: 44 g lighterE50: 104 g · MIO A702: 148 g
• WidthE50: 14 mm narrowerE50: 43.5 mm · MIO A702: 57.5 mm
• Screen diagonalE50: 0.6 in smaller diagonalE50: 2.1 in · MIO A702: 2.7 in
• DepthE50: 1 mm thinnerE50: 15.5 mm · MIO A702: 16.5 mm
• HeightMIO A702: 3 mm shorterMIO A702: 110 mm · E50: 113 mm
• Release year2007 / 2006MIO A702: 2007 · E50: 2006

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. MIO A702

   Height

   110 mm

   Width

   57.5 mm

   Depth

   16.5 mm

   Weight

   148 g

2. 2. E50

   Height

   113 mm

   Width

   43.5 mm

   Depth

   15.5 mm

   Weight

   104 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.