Mitac MIO A702 vs Sharp Aquos S3

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightMIO A702: 17.4 g lighterMIO A702: 148 g · Aquos S3: 165.4 g
• WidthMIO A702: 16.7 mm narrowerMIO A702: 57.5 mm · Aquos S3: 74.2 mm
• Screen diagonalMIO A702: 3.3 in smaller diagonalMIO A702: 2.7 in · Aquos S3: 6 in
• ChipsetTI OMAP 850 / Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm)MIO A702: TI OMAP 850 · Aquos S3: Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm)
• Rear camera layoutSingle / DualMIO A702: Single · Aquos S3: Dual
• DepthAquos S3: 8.5 mm thinnerAquos S3: 8 mm · MIO A702: 16.5 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. MIO A702

   Height

   110 mm

   Width

   57.5 mm

   Depth

   16.5 mm

   Weight

   148 g

2. 2. Aquos S3

   Height

   148.2 mm

   Width

   74.2 mm

   Depth

   8 mm

   Weight

   165.4 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.