Mitac MIO Explora K75 vs Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  MIO Explora K75: 95 g lighter

  MIO Explora K75:

  115 g

  Galaxy A9 Pro (2016):

  210 g

• Width

  MIO Explora K75: 19.4 mm narrower

  MIO Explora K75:

  61.5 mm

  Galaxy A9 Pro (2016):

  80.9 mm

• Screen diagonal

  MIO Explora K75: 2.5 in smaller diagonal

  MIO Explora K75:

  3.5 in

  Galaxy A9 Pro (2016):

  6 in

• Chipset

  MIO Explora K75:

  Qualcomm MSM7201A

  Galaxy A9 Pro (2016):

  Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 (28 nm)

• Depth

  Galaxy A9 Pro (2016): 4 mm thinner

  MIO Explora K75:

  11.9 mm

  Galaxy A9 Pro (2016):

  7.9 mm

• Height

  MIO Explora K75: 46.4 mm shorter

  MIO Explora K75:

  115.3 mm

  Galaxy A9 Pro (2016):

  161.7 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. MIO Explora K75

   Height:

   115.3 mm

   Width:

   61.5 mm

   Depth:

   11.9 mm +4 mm versus Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)

2. 2. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)

   Height:

   161.7 mm +46.4 mm versus MIO Explora K75

   Width:

   80.9 mm +19.4 mm versus MIO Explora K75

   Depth:

   7.9 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. MIO Explora K75

   Screen diagonal:

   3.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   34.9 cm²

2. 2. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)

   Screen diagonal:

   6 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   99.2 cm²

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has approximately 184.6% more rectangular screen area than MIO Explora K75.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.