Motorola ATRIX 4G vs ZTE Blade V

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Blade V: 5 g lighter

  ATRIX 4G:

  135 g

  Blade V:

  130 g

• Height

  ATRIX 4G: 8.2 mm shorter

  ATRIX 4G:

  117.8 mm

  Blade V:

  126 mm

• Release year

  ATRIX 4G:

  2011

  Blade V:

  2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. ATRIX 4G

   Height:

   117.8 mm

   Width:

   63.5 mm

   Depth:

   11 mm

2. 2. Blade V

   Height:

   126 mm +8.2 mm versus ATRIX 4G

   Width:

   64 mm

   Depth:

   10.9 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. ATRIX 4G

   Screen diagonal:

   4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   44.1 cm²

2. 2. Blade V

   Screen diagonal:

   4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   45.5 cm²

Blade V has approximately 3.2% more rectangular screen area than ATRIX 4G.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.