Motorola E895 vs Nokia 3250

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width

  3250: 1 mm narrower

  E895:

  51 mm

  3250:

  50 mm

• Depth

  3250: 3.2 mm thinner

  E895:

  23 mm

  3250:

  19.8 mm

• Height

  E895: 10.8 mm shorter

  E895:

  93 mm

  3250:

  103.8 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E895

   Height:

   93 mm

   Width:

   51 mm +1 mm versus 3250

   Depth:

   23 mm +3.2 mm versus 3250

2. 2. 3250

   Height:

   103.8 mm +10.8 mm versus E895

   Width:

   50 mm

   Depth:

   19.8 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. E895

   Screen diagonal:

   2.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   15 cm²

2. 2. 3250

   3250: Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.