Motorola E895 vs Xolo LT2000

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthE895: 24 mm narrowerE895: 51 mm · LT2000: 75 mm
• Screen diagonalE895: 3.3 in smaller diagonalE895: 2.2 in · LT2000: 5.5 in
• DepthLT2000: 13.7 mm thinnerLT2000: 9.3 mm · E895: 23 mm
• HeightE895: 59.4 mm shorterE895: 93 mm · LT2000: 152.4 mm
• Release year2005 / 2015E895: 2005 · LT2000: 2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E895

   Height

   93 mm

   Width

   51 mm

   Depth

   23 mm+13.7 mm versus LT2000

   Weight

   127 g

2. 2. LT2000

   Height

   152.4 mm+59.4 mm versus E895

   Width

   75 mm+24 mm versus E895

   Depth

   9.3 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. E895 2.2 in · 4:3 About 15 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. LT2000 5.5 in · 16:9 About 83.4 cm² rectangular area

LT2000 has approximately 456.4% more rectangular screen area than E895.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.