Motorola MC55 vs QMobile E1

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthE1: 5 mm narrowerE1: 72 mm · MC55: 77 mm
• Screen diagonalMC55: 1.5 in smaller diagonalMC55: 3.5 in · E1: 5 in
• DepthE1: 18.1 mm thinnerE1: 8.9 mm · MC55: 27 mm
• HeightE1: 8.2 mm shorterE1: 143.8 mm · MC55: 152 mm
• Release year2009 / 2017MC55: 2009 · E1: 2017

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. MC55

   Height

   152 mm+8.2 mm versus E1

   Width

   77 mm+5 mm versus E1

   Depth

   27 mm+18.1 mm versus E1

   Weight

   336 g

2. 2. E1

   Height

   143.8 mm

   Width

   72 mm

   Depth

   8.9 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. MC55 3.5 in · 4:3 About 37.9 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. E1 5 in · 16:9 About 68.9 cm² rectangular area

E1 has approximately 81.7% more rectangular screen area than MC55.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• W31 vs E1