Motorola MPx vs Nokia E62

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightE62: 30 g lighterE62: 144 g · MPx: 174 g
• WidthMPx: 8.5 mm narrowerMPx: 61.2 mm · E62: 69.7 mm
• DepthE62: 10 mm thinnerE62: 14 mm · MPx: 24 mm
• HeightMPx: 17.3 mm shorterMPx: 99.7 mm · E62: 117 mm
• Release year2004 / 2006MPx: 2004 · E62: 2006

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. MPx

   Height

   99.7 mm

   Width

   61.2 mm

   Depth

   24 mm+10 mm versus E62

   Weight

   174 g

2. 2. E62

   Height

   117 mm+17.3 mm versus MPx

   Width

   69.7 mm+8.5 mm versus MPx

   Depth

   14 mm

   Weight

   144 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. MPx 2.8 in · 4:3 About 24.3 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. E62 2.9 in · 4:3 About 26 cm² rectangular area

E62 has approximately 7.3% more rectangular screen area than MPx.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.