Motorola Quench XT3 XT502 vs O2 XDA Orbit

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Quench XT3 XT502: 15 g lighter

  Quench XT3 XT502:

  114 g

  XDA Orbit:

  129 g

• Width

  Quench XT3 XT502: 1.2 mm narrower

  Quench XT3 XT502:

  56.8 mm

  XDA Orbit:

  58 mm

• Screen diagonal

  XDA Orbit: 0.4 in smaller diagonal

  Quench XT3 XT502:

  3.2 in

  XDA Orbit:

  2.8 in

• Chipset

  Quench XT3 XT502:

  Qualcomm MSM7227 Snapdragon S1

  XDA Orbit:

  TI OMAP 850

• Depth

  Quench XT3 XT502: 4.2 mm thinner

  Quench XT3 XT502:

  12.6 mm

  XDA Orbit:

  16.8 mm

• Height

  XDA Orbit: 6.9 mm shorter

  Quench XT3 XT502:

  114.9 mm

  XDA Orbit:

  108 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Quench XT3 XT502

   Height:

   114.9 mm +6.9 mm versus XDA Orbit

   Width:

   56.8 mm

   Depth:

   12.6 mm

2. 2. XDA Orbit

   Height:

   108 mm

   Width:

   58 mm +1.2 mm versus Quench XT3 XT502

   Depth:

   16.8 mm +4.2 mm versus Quench XT3 XT502

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Quench XT3 XT502

   Screen diagonal:

   3.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   3:2

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   30.5 cm²

2. 2. XDA Orbit

   Screen diagonal:

   2.8 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   24.3 cm²

Quench XT3 XT502 has approximately 25.6% more rectangular screen area than XDA Orbit.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.