Motorola RAZR MAXX vs Nokia E61

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Screen diagonal

  E61: 1.4 in smaller diagonal

  RAZR MAXX:

  4.3 in

  E61:

  2.9 in

• Depth

  RAZR MAXX: 5 mm thinner

  RAZR MAXX:

  9 mm

  E61:

  14 mm

• Height

  E61: 13.7 mm shorter

  RAZR MAXX:

  130.7 mm

  E61:

  117 mm

• Release year

  RAZR MAXX:

  2012

  E61:

  2005

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. RAZR MAXX

   Height:

   130.7 mm +13.7 mm versus E61

   Width:

   68.9 mm

   Depth:

   9 mm

2. 2. E61

   Height:

   117 mm

   Width:

   69.7 mm

   Depth:

   14 mm +5 mm versus RAZR MAXX

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. RAZR MAXX

   Screen diagonal:

   4.3 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   51 cm²

2. 2. E61

   Screen diagonal:

   2.9 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   26 cm²

RAZR MAXX has approximately 95.7% more rectangular screen area than E61.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.