Motorola XT760 vs Nokia E71

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthE71: 7 mm narrowerE71: 57 mm · XT760: 64 mm
• Screen diagonalE71: 1.64 in smaller diagonalE71: 2.36 in · XT760: 4 in
• HeightE71: 6.8 mm shorterE71: 114 mm · XT760: 120.8 mm
• Release year2012 / 2008XT760: 2012 · E71: 2008

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. XT760

   Height

   120.8 mm+6.8 mm versus E71

   Width

   64 mm+7 mm versus E71

   Depth

   9.9 mm

   Weight

   125 g

2. 2. E71

   Height

   114 mm

   Width

   57 mm

   Depth

   10 mm

   Weight

   127 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. XT760 4 in · 16:9 About 44.1 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. E71 2.36 in · 4:3 About 17.2 cm² rectangular area

XT760 has approximately 155.7% more rectangular screen area than E71.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.