You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.<
  1. Home
  2. Motorola XT810 vs Nokia E75

Motorola XT810 vs Nokia E75

Compare recorded specifications, size and practical differences.

Nokia E75

Nokia E75

Replace E75
Enter at least 3 characters. Tab to a result and press Enter to select.

    Remove E75
    + Add a third phone
    Enter at least 3 characters. Tab to a result and press Enter to select.

      Key differences

      Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

      • WeightE75: 26 g lighterE75: 139 g · XT810: 165 g
      • WidthE75: 7 mm narrowerE75: 50 mm · XT810: 57 mm
      • Screen diagonalE75: 0.8 in smaller diagonalE75: 2.4 in · XT810: 3.2 in
      • DepthE75: 4.2 mm thinnerE75: 14.4 mm · XT810: 18.6 mm
      • Release year2010 / 2009XT810: 2010 · E75: 2009

      Physical size

      Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

      Front
      XT810: 109.9 × 57 mm 1 E75: 111.8 × 50 mm 2
      Side
      XT810: 109.9 × 18.6 mm 1 E75: 111.8 × 14.4 mm 2
      1. 1. XT810
        Height
        109.9 mm
        Width
        57 mm
        Depth
        18.6 mm
        Weight
        165 g
      2. 2. E75
        Height
        111.8 mm
        Width
        50 mm
        Depth
        14.4 mm
        Weight
        139 g

      Specifications

      Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

      Everyday essentials
      Everyday essentials
      SpecificationXT810E75
      Dimensions (HxWxD)
      • 109.9 Х 57 Х 18.6 mm
      • 111.8 Х 50 Х 14.4 mm
      Weight
      • 165 g
      • 139 g
      Technology
      • TFT
      • TFT
      Screen size
      • 3.2" inch
      • 2.4" inch
      Screen resolution
      • 480 x 854 px
      • 240 x 320 px
      Internal memoryRecorded storage / RAM variants. Entries are alternatives, not a combined maximum. Ambiguous formats stay as recorded.
      • 512 MB
      • 256 MB RAM
      • 85 MB
      Memory card support
      • microSD
      • up to 32 GB (dedicated slot)
      • microSD
      • up to 16 GB (dedicated slot)
      • 4 GB included
      BatteryCapacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.
      • 0 mAh,
      • 1000 mAh
      • Removable Li-Ion
      Operating system OS
      • Android-based OPhone 2.0
      • Symbian
      • S60 rel. 3.2
      Chipset
      • TI OMAP 3430
      		 Unknown
      Headphone jack
      • Yes
      • Yes
      Display
      Display
      SpecificationXT810E75
      Touchscreen
      • resistive touchscreen
      		 Unknown
      Display colors
      • 16M
      • 16M
      Screen area
      • 28.2 cm2
      • 17.8 cm2
      Screen format
      • 16:9 (height:width)
      • 4:3 (height:width)
      Screen to body ratio
      • 45.0%
      • 31.9%
      PPI /points per inch/
      • 306 PPI
      • 167 PPI
      Camera and Video
      Camera and Video
      SpecificationXT810E75
      Rear camera, main
      • 5 MP
      • Single
      • 3.2 MP
      • Single
      Camera specs
      • 5 MP
      • AF
      • 3.2 MP
      • AF
      Functions
      • LED flash
      • LED flash
      Video
      • 480p@24fps
      • 480p
      Front camera, selfie
      • 0.3 MP
      • Single
      • 0.3 MP
      • Single
      Specifications
      • VGA
      • VGA videocall camera
      Performance
      Performance
      SpecificationXT810E75
      Processor CPU
      • 600 MHz Cortex-A8
      • 369 MHz ARM 11
      Graphics processor GPU
      • PowerVR SGX530
      		 Unknown
      General specs
      General specs
      SpecificationXT810E75
      Release date
      • 2010
      • September
      • 2009
      • February
      Colors
      • Gray
      • Silver black
      • Red and Copper yellow
      Historical recorded priceLegacy catalogue value; date unknown. Not a current offer. Unknown
      • 130 EUR
      Battery life Unknown
      • Stand by time- Up to 280 h (2G) / 264 h (3G) Talking time- Up to 5 h 20 min (2G) / 4 h 12 min (3G) Music play - Up to 25 h
      Communication and Connectivity
      Communication and Connectivity
      SpecificationXT810E75
      SIM card
      • Mini-SIM
      • Mini-SIM
      Network
      • Show all network frequencies: -2G - GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900
      • Show all network frequencies: -2G - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
      Speed
      • HSPA
      • HSPA 3.6/0.384 Mbps
      GPRS
      • Class 10
      • Class 32
      Edge
      • Class 10
      • Class 32
      • 296 / 177.6 kbits
      Wi-Fi
      • Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g
      • hotspot
      • Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g
      • UPnP technology
      GPS
      • Yes
      • with A-GPS
      • Yes
      • with A-GPS; Nokia Maps
      USB
      • microUSB 2.0
      • microUSB 2.0
      Bluetooth
      • 2.1
      • A2DP
      • EDR
      • 2.0
      • A2DP
      Harmful irradiation Unknown
      • SAR - 1.21 W/kg (head) 1.02 W/kg (body) SAR EU - 0.99 W/kg (head)
      Music and Audio
      Music and Audio
      SpecificationXT810E75
      Radio
      • Stereo FM radio
      • RDS
      • Stereo FM radio
      • RDS
      Others
      • External capacitive display
      		 Unknown
      Other features
      Other features
      SpecificationXT810E75
      Dop
      • Sensors Accelerometer
      • compass - CMMB mobile TV -MP3/WAV/WMA/AAC+ player -MP4/H.264/WMV player -Document viewer -Organizer -Voice memo -Predictive text input - For China Mobile Previously rumored as Motorola Beihai
      • Sensors Accelerometer WMV/RV/MP4/3GP player -MP3/WMA/WAV/RA/AAC/M4A player -Document editor (Word
      • Excel
      • PowerPoint
      • PDF) incl. MS Office 2007 support via free update -Voice memo -Predictive text input

      Similar comparisons