Motorola XT810 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek)

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width

  XT810: 19 mm narrower

  XT810:

  57 mm

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek):

  76 mm

• Screen diagonal

  XT810: 2.3 in smaller diagonal

  XT810:

  3.2 in

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek):

  5.5 in

• Chipset

  XT810:

  TI OMAP 3430

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek):

  Mediatek MT6795 Helio X10 (28 nm)

• Depth

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek): 9.9 mm thinner

  XT810:

  18.6 mm

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek):

  8.7 mm

• Height

  XT810: 40.1 mm shorter

  XT810:

  109.9 mm

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek):

  150 mm

• Release year

  XT810:

  2010

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek):

  2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. XT810

   Height:

   109.9 mm

   Width:

   57 mm

   Depth:

   18.6 mm +9.9 mm versus Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek)

2. 2. Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek)

   Height:

   150 mm +40.1 mm versus XT810

   Width:

   76 mm +19 mm versus XT810

   Depth:

   8.7 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. XT810

   Screen diagonal:

   3.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   28.2 cm²

2. 2. Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek)

   Screen diagonal:

   5.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   83.4 cm²

Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) has approximately 195.4% more rectangular screen area than XT810.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.