Motorola XT810 vs Yezz Andy 6Q

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Andy 6Q: 5 g lighter

  XT810:

  165 g

  Andy 6Q:

  160 g

• Width

  XT810: 27 mm narrower

  XT810:

  57 mm

  Andy 6Q:

  84 mm

• Screen diagonal

  XT810: 2.8 in smaller diagonal

  XT810:

  3.2 in

  Andy 6Q:

  6 in

• Chipset

  XT810:

  TI OMAP 3430

  Andy 6Q:

  Mediatek MT6582 (28 nm)

• Depth

  Andy 6Q: 10.8 mm thinner

  XT810:

  18.6 mm

  Andy 6Q:

  7.8 mm

• Height

  XT810: 55.1 mm shorter

  XT810:

  109.9 mm

  Andy 6Q:

  165 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. XT810

   Height:

   109.9 mm

   Width:

   57 mm

   Depth:

   18.6 mm +10.8 mm versus Andy 6Q

2. 2. Andy 6Q

   Height:

   165 mm +55.1 mm versus XT810

   Width:

   84 mm +27 mm versus XT810

   Depth:

   7.8 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. XT810

   Screen diagonal:

   3.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   28.2 cm²

2. 2. Andy 6Q

   Screen diagonal:

   6 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   99.2 cm²

Andy 6Q has approximately 251.6% more rectangular screen area than XT810.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.