Nokia 2.1 vs Nokia 3.2

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight2.1: 7 g lighter2.1: 174 g · 3.2: 181 g
• Width3.2: 1.4 mm narrower3.2: 76.2 mm · 2.1: 77.6 mm
• Screen diagonal2.1: 0.76 in smaller diagonal2.1: 5.5 in · 3.2: 6.26 in
• ChipsetQualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 (28 nm) / Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 4292.1: Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 (28 nm) · 3.2: Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429
• Depth3.2: 1.1 mm thinner3.2: 8.6 mm · 2.1: 9.7 mm
• Height2.1: 5.8 mm shorter2.1: 153.6 mm · 3.2: 159.4 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 2.1

   Height

   153.6 mm

   Width

   77.6 mm

   Depth

   9.7 mm

   Weight

   174 g

2. 2. 3.2

   Height

   159.4 mm

   Width

   76.2 mm

   Depth

   8.6 mm

   Weight

   181 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• Redmi 9C vs 3.2
• K8 (2018) vs 2.1