Nokia 2.1 vs Oppo A31

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight2.1: 6 g lighter2.1: 174 g · A31: 180 g
• WidthA31: 2.1 mm narrowerA31: 75.5 mm · 2.1: 77.6 mm
• Screen diagonal2.1: 1 in smaller diagonal2.1: 5.5 in · A31: 6.5 in
• Rear camera layoutSingle / Triple2.1: Single · A31: Triple
• DepthA31: 1.4 mm thinnerA31: 8.3 mm · 2.1: 9.7 mm
• Height2.1: 10.3 mm shorter2.1: 153.6 mm · A31: 163.9 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 2.1

   Height

   153.6 mm

   Width

   77.6 mm+2.1 mm versus A31

   Depth

   9.7 mm+1.4 mm versus A31

   Weight

   174 g

2. 2. A31

   Height

   163.9 mm+10.3 mm versus 2.1

   Width

   75.5 mm

   Depth

   8.3 mm

   Weight

   180 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. 2.1 5.5 in · 16:9 About 83.4 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. A31 6.5 in · 20:9 About 102 cm² rectangular area

A31 has approximately 22.3% more rectangular screen area than 2.1.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.