Nokia 3.1 C vs Nokia 600

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight600: 56 g lighter600: 100 g · 3.1 C: 156 g
• Width600: 18.9 mm narrower600: 53 mm · 3.1 C: 71.9 mm
• Screen diagonal600: 2.25 in smaller diagonal600: 3.2 in · 3.1 C: 5.45 in
• Depth3.1 C: 3.6 mm thinner3.1 C: 9.4 mm · 600: 13 mm
• Height600: 41.7 mm shorter600: 111 mm · 3.1 C: 152.7 mm
• Release year2019 / 20113.1 C: 2019 · 600: 2011

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 3.1 C

   Height

   152.7 mm+41.7 mm versus 600

   Width

   71.9 mm+18.9 mm versus 600

   Depth

   9.4 mm

   Weight

   156 g

2. 2. 600

   Height

   111 mm

   Width

   53 mm

   Depth

   13 mm+3.6 mm versus 3.1 C

   Weight

   100 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. 3.1 C 5.45 in · 18:9 About 76.7 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. 600 3.2 in · 16:9 About 28.2 cm² rectangular area

3.1 C has approximately 171.5% more rectangular screen area than 600.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.