Nokia 3.1 Plus vs T-Mobile myTouch 3G 1.2

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  myTouch 3G 1.2: 64 g lighter

  3.1 Plus:

  180 g

  myTouch 3G 1.2:

  116 g

• Width

  myTouch 3G 1.2: 20.4 mm narrower

  3.1 Plus:

  76.4 mm

  myTouch 3G 1.2:

  56 mm

• Screen diagonal

  myTouch 3G 1.2: 2.8 in smaller diagonal

  3.1 Plus:

  6 in

  myTouch 3G 1.2:

  3.2 in

• Chipset

  3.1 Plus:

  Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm)

  myTouch 3G 1.2:

  Qualcomm MSM7201A

• Rear camera layout

  3.1 Plus:

  Dual

  myTouch 3G 1.2:

  Single

• Depth

  3.1 Plus: 6.5 mm thinner

  3.1 Plus:

  8.2 mm

  myTouch 3G 1.2:

  14.7 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 3.1 Plus

   Height:

   156.9 mm +43.9 mm versus myTouch 3G 1.2

   Width:

   76.4 mm +20.4 mm versus myTouch 3G 1.2

   Depth:

   8.2 mm

2. 2. myTouch 3G 1.2

   Height:

   113 mm

   Width:

   56 mm

   Depth:

   14.7 mm +6.5 mm versus 3.1 Plus

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. 3.1 Plus

   Screen diagonal:

   6 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   18:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   92.9 cm²

2. 2. myTouch 3G 1.2

   Screen diagonal:

   3.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   3:2

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   30.5 cm²

3.1 Plus has approximately 204.7% more rectangular screen area than myTouch 3G 1.2.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.