Nokia 3.2 vs Nokia 4.2

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight4.2: 20 g lighter4.2: 161 g · 3.2: 181 g
• Width4.2: 4.9 mm narrower4.2: 71.3 mm · 3.2: 76.2 mm
• Screen diagonal4.2: 0.55 in smaller diagonal4.2: 5.71 in · 3.2: 6.26 in
• ChipsetQualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429 / Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 (12 nm)3.2: Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429 · 4.2: Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 (12 nm)
• Rear camera layoutSingle / Dual3.2: Single · 4.2: Dual
• Height4.2: 10.4 mm shorter4.2: 149 mm · 3.2: 159.4 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 3.2

   Height

   159.4 mm

   Width

   76.2 mm

   Depth

   8.6 mm

   Weight

   181 g

2. 2. 4.2

   Height

   149 mm

   Width

   71.3 mm

   Depth

   8.4 mm

   Weight

   161 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• Redmi 9C vs 3.2