Nokia 3.2 vs O2 XDA Orbit

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightXDA Orbit: 52 g lighterXDA Orbit: 129 g · 3.2: 181 g
• WidthXDA Orbit: 18.2 mm narrowerXDA Orbit: 58 mm · 3.2: 76.2 mm
• Screen diagonalXDA Orbit: 3.46 in smaller diagonalXDA Orbit: 2.8 in · 3.2: 6.26 in
• ChipsetQualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429 / TI OMAP 8503.2: Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429 · XDA Orbit: TI OMAP 850
• Depth3.2: 8.2 mm thinner3.2: 8.6 mm · XDA Orbit: 16.8 mm
• HeightXDA Orbit: 51.4 mm shorterXDA Orbit: 108 mm · 3.2: 159.4 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 3.2

   Height

   159.4 mm

   Width

   76.2 mm

   Depth

   8.6 mm

   Weight

   181 g

2. 2. XDA Orbit

   Height

   108 mm

   Width

   58 mm

   Depth

   16.8 mm

   Weight

   129 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• Redmi 9C vs 3.2