Nokia 3.2 vs Samsung Galaxy Star Trios S5283

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Galaxy Star Trios S5283: 76 g lighter

  3.2:

  181 g

  Galaxy Star Trios S5283:

  105 g

• Width

  Galaxy Star Trios S5283: 15.2 mm narrower

  3.2:

  76.2 mm

  Galaxy Star Trios S5283:

  61 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Galaxy Star Trios S5283: 3.12 in smaller diagonal

  3.2:

  6.26 in

  Galaxy Star Trios S5283:

  3.14 in

• Chipset

  3.2:

  Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429

  Galaxy Star Trios S5283:

  Qualcomm MSM7225A Snapdragon S1

• Depth

  3.2: 2.4 mm thinner

  3.2:

  8.6 mm

  Galaxy Star Trios S5283:

  11 mm

• Height

  Galaxy Star Trios S5283: 53.4 mm shorter

  3.2:

  159.4 mm

  Galaxy Star Trios S5283:

  106 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 3.2

   Height:

   159.4 mm +53.4 mm versus Galaxy Star Trios S5283

   Width:

   76.2 mm +15.2 mm versus Galaxy Star Trios S5283

   Depth:

   8.6 mm

2. 2. Galaxy Star Trios S5283

   Height:

   106 mm

   Width:

   61 mm

   Depth:

   11 mm +2.4 mm versus 3.2

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. 3.2

   Screen diagonal:

   6.26 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   19:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   97.8 cm²

2. 2. Galaxy Star Trios S5283

   Screen diagonal:

   3.14 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   30.5 cm²

3.2 has approximately 220.3% more rectangular screen area than Galaxy Star Trios S5283.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.