Nokia 3.2 vs Sharp Aquos Xx

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightAquos Xx: 13 g lighterAquos Xx: 168 g · 3.2: 181 g
• Width3.2: 2.8 mm narrower3.2: 76.2 mm · Aquos Xx: 79 mm
• Screen diagonalAquos Xx: 0.56 in smaller diagonalAquos Xx: 5.7 in · 3.2: 6.26 in
• ChipsetQualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429 / Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 (20 nm)3.2: Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429 · Aquos Xx: Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 (20 nm)
• HeightAquos Xx: 13.4 mm shorterAquos Xx: 146 mm · 3.2: 159.4 mm
• Release year2019 / 20153.2: 2019 · Aquos Xx: 2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 3.2

   Height

   159.4 mm

   Width

   76.2 mm

   Depth

   8.6 mm

   Weight

   181 g

2. 2. Aquos Xx

   Height

   146 mm

   Width

   79 mm

   Depth

   8.7 mm

   Weight

   168 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• Redmi 9C vs 3.2