Nokia 3.2 vs TECNO Camon CX Manchester City LE

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Camon CX Manchester City LE: 31 g lighter

  3.2:

  181 g

  Camon CX Manchester City LE:

  150 g

• Screen diagonal

  Camon CX Manchester City LE: 0.76 in smaller diagonal

  3.2:

  6.26 in

  Camon CX Manchester City LE:

  5.5 in

• Chipset

  3.2:

  Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429

  Camon CX Manchester City LE:

  Mediatek MT6750T (28 nm)

• Depth

  Camon CX Manchester City LE: 3 mm thinner

  3.2:

  8.6 mm

  Camon CX Manchester City LE:

  5.6 mm

• Height

  Camon CX Manchester City LE: 6.6 mm shorter

  3.2:

  159.4 mm

  Camon CX Manchester City LE:

  152.8 mm

• Release year

  3.2:

  2019

  Camon CX Manchester City LE:

  2017

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 3.2

   Height:

   159.4 mm +6.6 mm versus Camon CX Manchester City LE

   Width:

   76.2 mm

   Depth:

   8.6 mm +3 mm versus Camon CX Manchester City LE

2. 2. Camon CX Manchester City LE

   Height:

   152.8 mm

   Width:

   75.8 mm

   Depth:

   5.6 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. 3.2

   Screen diagonal:

   6.26 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   19:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   97.8 cm²

2. 2. Camon CX Manchester City LE

   Screen diagonal:

   5.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   83.4 cm²

3.2 has approximately 17.3% more rectangular screen area than Camon CX Manchester City LE.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.