Nokia 3.2 vs ZTE Blade Force

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightBlade Force: 10.9 g lighterBlade Force: 170.1 g · 3.2: 181 g
• Width3.2: 1.8 mm narrower3.2: 76.2 mm · Blade Force: 78 mm
• Screen diagonalBlade Force: 0.76 in smaller diagonalBlade Force: 5.5 in · 3.2: 6.26 in
• ChipsetQualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429 / Qualcomm MSM8920 Snapdragon 427 (28 nm)3.2: Qualcomm SDM429 Snapdragon 429 · Blade Force: Qualcomm MSM8920 Snapdragon 427 (28 nm)
• Depth3.2: 0.5 mm thinner3.2: 8.6 mm · Blade Force: 9.1 mm
• HeightBlade Force: 3.4 mm shorterBlade Force: 156 mm · 3.2: 159.4 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 3.2

   Height

   159.4 mm

   Width

   76.2 mm

   Depth

   8.6 mm

   Weight

   181 g

2. 2. Blade Force

   Height

   156 mm

   Width

   78 mm

   Depth

   9.1 mm

   Weight

   170.1 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• Redmi 9C vs 3.2