Nokia 3.2 vs ZTE V875

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  V875: 55.6 g lighter

  3.2:

  181 g

  V875:

  125.4 g

• Width

  V875: 16.2 mm narrower

  3.2:

  76.2 mm

  V875:

  60 mm

• Screen diagonal

  V875: 3.06 in smaller diagonal

  3.2:

  6.26 in

  V875:

  3.2 in

• Depth

  3.2: 2.7 mm thinner

  3.2:

  8.6 mm

  V875:

  11.3 mm

• Height

  V875: 37.4 mm shorter

  3.2:

  159.4 mm

  V875:

  122 mm

• Release year

  3.2:

  2019

  V875:

  2012

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 3.2

   Height:

   159.4 mm +37.4 mm versus V875

   Width:

   76.2 mm +16.2 mm versus V875

   Depth:

   8.6 mm

2. 2. V875

   Height:

   122 mm

   Width:

   60 mm

   Depth:

   11.3 mm +2.7 mm versus 3.2

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. 3.2

   Screen diagonal:

   6.26 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   19:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   97.8 cm²

2. 2. V875

   Screen diagonal:

   3.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   31.7 cm²

3.2 has approximately 208.4% more rectangular screen area than V875.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.