Nokia 3230 vs Nokia 6630

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  3230: 17 g lighter

  3230:

  110 g

  6630:

  127 g

• Width

  3230: 11 mm narrower

  3230:

  49 mm

  6630:

  60 mm

• Chipset

  3230:

  TI OMAP 1510

  6630:

  TI OMAP 1710

• Depth

  3230: 2 mm thinner

  3230:

  19 mm

  6630:

  21 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 3230

   Height:

   109 mm

   Width:

   49 mm

   Depth:

   19 mm

   Weight:

   110 g

2. 2. 6630

   Height:

   110 mm

   Width:

   60 mm +11 mm versus 3230

   Depth:

   21 mm +2 mm versus 3230

   Weight:

   127 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. 3230

   3230: Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting.

2. 2. 6630

   6630: Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.