Nokia 3650 vs Philips V900

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Nokia 3650 is 23.5 g lighter than Philips V900.

  Nokia 3650 — Weight: 130 g. Philips V900 — Weight: 153.5 g.

• Width

  Nokia 3650 is 5.4 mm narrower than Philips V900.

  Nokia 3650 — Width: 57 mm. Philips V900 — Width: 62.4 mm.

• Screen diagonal

  The screen diagonal of Nokia 3650 is 1.4 in smaller than that of Philips V900.

  Nokia 3650 — Screen diagonal: 2.1 in. Philips V900 — Screen diagonal: 3.5 in.

• Depth

  Philips V900 is 12.8 mm thinner than Nokia 3650.

  Nokia 3650 — Depth: 26 mm. Philips V900 — Depth: 13.2 mm.

• Height

  Philips V900 is 15 mm shorter than Nokia 3650.

  Nokia 3650 — Height: 130 mm. Philips V900 — Height: 115 mm.

• Release year

  The recorded release year for Nokia 3650 is 2003. The recorded release year for Philips V900 is 2010.

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Nokia 3650

   Height:

   130 mm +15 mm versus Philips V900

   Width:

   57 mm

   Depth:

   26 mm +12.8 mm versus Philips V900

   Weight:

   130 g

2. 2. Philips V900

   Height:

   115 mm

   Width:

   62.4 mm +5.4 mm versus Nokia 3650

   Depth:

   13.2 mm

   Weight:

   153.5 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. Nokia 3650

   Nokia 3650: Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting.

2. 2. Philips V900

   Screen diagonal:

   3.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   34.9 cm²

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.