Nokia 4.2 vs TECNO Camon iACE2

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightCamon iACE2: 11 g lighterCamon iACE2: 150 g · 4.2: 161 g
• Screen diagonalCamon iACE2: 0.21 in smaller diagonalCamon iACE2: 5.5 in · 4.2: 5.71 in
• ChipsetQualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 (12 nm) / Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm)4.2: Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 (12 nm) · Camon iACE2: Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm)

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 4.2

   Height

   149 mm

   Width

   71.3 mm

   Depth

   8.4 mm

   Weight

   161 g

2. 2. Camon iACE2

   Height

   148.3 mm

   Width

   71.9 mm

   Depth

   8.5 mm

   Weight

   150 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. 4.2 5.71 in · 19:9 About 81.4 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Camon iACE2 5.5 in · 18:9 About 78.1 cm² rectangular area

4.2 has approximately 4.2% more rectangular screen area than Camon iACE2.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• Find 5 Mini vs Camon iACE2