Nokia 5.1 Plus (Nokia X5) vs Palm Treo 680

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width

  Treo 680: 13.6 mm narrower

  5.1 Plus (Nokia X5):

  72 mm

  Treo 680:

  58.4 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Treo 680: 3.36 in smaller diagonal

  5.1 Plus (Nokia X5):

  5.86 in

  Treo 680:

  2.5 in

• Rear camera layout

  5.1 Plus (Nokia X5):

  Dual

  Treo 680:

  Single

• Depth

  5.1 Plus (Nokia X5): 12.2 mm thinner

  5.1 Plus (Nokia X5):

  8.1 mm

  Treo 680:

  20.3 mm

• Height

  Treo 680: 37.7 mm shorter

  5.1 Plus (Nokia X5):

  149.5 mm

  Treo 680:

  111.8 mm

• Release year

  5.1 Plus (Nokia X5):

  2018

  Treo 680:

  2006

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 5.1 Plus (Nokia X5)

   Height:

   149.5 mm +37.7 mm versus Treo 680

   Width:

   72 mm +13.6 mm versus Treo 680

   Depth:

   8.1 mm

2. 2. Treo 680

   Height:

   111.8 mm

   Width:

   58.4 mm

   Depth:

   20.3 mm +12.2 mm versus 5.1 Plus (Nokia X5)

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. 5.1 Plus (Nokia X5)

   Screen diagonal:

   5.86 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   19:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   85.7 cm²

2. 2. Treo 680

   Screen diagonal:

   2.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   1:1

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   20.2 cm²

5.1 Plus (Nokia X5) has approximately 325.1% more rectangular screen area than Treo 680.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.