Nokia 5250 vs ZTE U880E

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  Nokia 5250 is 34 g lighter than ZTE U880E.

  Nokia 5250 — Weight: 107 g. ZTE U880E — Weight: 141 g.

• Width

  Nokia 5250 is 14.6 mm narrower than ZTE U880E.

  Nokia 5250 — Width: 49 mm. ZTE U880E — Width: 63.6 mm.

• Screen diagonal

  The screen diagonal of Nokia 5250 is 1.2 in smaller than that of ZTE U880E.

  Nokia 5250 — Screen diagonal: 2.8 in. ZTE U880E — Screen diagonal: 4 in.

• Depth

  ZTE U880E is 3.2 mm thinner than Nokia 5250.

  Nokia 5250 — Depth: 14 mm. ZTE U880E — Depth: 10.8 mm.

• Height

  Nokia 5250 is 16.5 mm shorter than ZTE U880E.

  Nokia 5250 — Height: 104 mm. ZTE U880E — Height: 120.5 mm.

• Release year

  The recorded release year for Nokia 5250 is 2010. The recorded release year for ZTE U880E is 2012.

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Nokia 5250

   Height:

   104 mm

   Width:

   49 mm

   Depth:

   14 mm +3.2 mm versus ZTE U880E

   Weight:

   107 g

2. 2. ZTE U880E

   Height:

   120.5 mm +16.5 mm versus Nokia 5250

   Width:

   63.6 mm +14.6 mm versus Nokia 5250

   Depth:

   10.8 mm

   Weight:

   141 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Nokia 5250

   Screen diagonal:

   2.8 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   21.6 cm²

2. 2. ZTE U880E

   Screen diagonal:

   4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   45.5 cm²

ZTE U880E has approximately 110.7% more rectangular screen area than Nokia 5250.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.