Nokia 5700 vs Oppo Ace2

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight5700: 71 g lighter5700: 115 g · Ace2: 186 g
• Width5700: 25.4 mm narrower5700: 50 mm · Ace2: 75.4 mm
• Screen diagonal5700: 4.35 in smaller diagonal5700: 2.2 in · Ace2: 6.55 in
• Rear camera layoutSingle / Quad5700: Single · Ace2: Quad
• DepthAce2: 8.4 mm thinnerAce2: 8.6 mm · 5700: 17 mm
• Height5700: 52 mm shorter5700: 108 mm · Ace2: 160 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 5700

   Height

   108 mm

   Width

   50 mm

   Depth

   17 mm+8.4 mm versus Ace2

   Weight

   115 g

2. 2. Ace2

   Height

   160 mm+52 mm versus 5700

   Width

   75.4 mm+25.4 mm versus 5700

   Depth

   8.6 mm

   Weight

   186 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. 5700 2.2 in · 4:3 About 15 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Ace2 6.55 in · 20:9 About 103.6 cm² rectangular area

Ace2 has approximately 591.1% more rectangular screen area than 5700.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.