Nokia 603 vs Nokia 702T

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  603: 17.4 g lighter

  603:

  109.6 g

  702T:

  127 g

• Width

  603: 3.3 mm narrower

  603:

  57.1 mm

  702T:

  60.4 mm

• Screen diagonal

  702T: 1.04 in smaller diagonal

  603:

  3.5 in

  702T:

  2.46 in

• Depth

  702T: 2.7 mm thinner

  603:

  12.7 mm

  702T:

  10 mm

• Height

  603: 3.6 mm shorter

  603:

  113.5 mm

  702T:

  117.1 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 603

   Height:

   113.5 mm

   Width:

   57.1 mm

   Depth:

   12.7 mm +2.7 mm versus 702T

2. 2. 702T

   Height:

   117.1 mm +3.6 mm versus 603

   Width:

   60.4 mm +3.3 mm versus 603

   Depth:

   10 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. 603

   Screen diagonal:

   3.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   33.8 cm²

2. 2. 702T

   Screen diagonal:

   2.46 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   18.7 cm²

603 has approximately 80.2% more rectangular screen area than 702T.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.