Nokia 6124 classic vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek)

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  6124 classic: 71 g lighter

  6124 classic:

  93 g

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek):

  164 g

• Width

  6124 classic: 30 mm narrower

  6124 classic:

  46 mm

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek):

  76 mm

• Screen diagonal

  6124 classic: 3.5 in smaller diagonal

  6124 classic:

  2 in

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek):

  5.5 in

• Depth

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek): 6.3 mm thinner

  6124 classic:

  15 mm

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek):

  8.7 mm

• Height

  6124 classic: 45 mm shorter

  6124 classic:

  105 mm

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek):

  150 mm

• Release year

  6124 classic:

  2008

  Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek):

  2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 6124 classic

   Height:

   105 mm

   Width:

   46 mm

   Depth:

   15 mm +6.3 mm versus Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek)

2. 2. Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek)

   Height:

   150 mm +45 mm versus 6124 classic

   Width:

   76 mm +30 mm versus 6124 classic

   Depth:

   8.7 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. 6124 classic

   Screen diagonal:

   2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   12.4 cm²

2. 2. Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek)

   Screen diagonal:

   5.5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   83.4 cm²

Redmi Note 3 (MediaTek) has approximately 573.2% more rectangular screen area than 6124 classic.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.