Nokia 6.2 vs Nokia N81

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightN81: 40 g lighterN81: 140 g · 6.2: 180 g
• WidthN81: 25.1 mm narrowerN81: 50 mm · 6.2: 75.1 mm
• Screen diagonalN81: 3.9 in smaller diagonalN81: 2.4 in · 6.2: 6.3 in
• Rear camera layoutTriple / Single6.2: Triple · N81: Single
• Depth6.2: 9.6 mm thinner6.2: 8.3 mm · N81: 17.9 mm
• HeightN81: 57.9 mm shorterN81: 102 mm · 6.2: 159.9 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 6.2

   Height

   159.9 mm+57.9 mm versus N81

   Width

   75.1 mm+25.1 mm versus N81

   Depth

   8.3 mm

   Weight

   180 g

2. 2. N81

   Height

   102 mm

   Width

   50 mm

   Depth

   17.9 mm+9.6 mm versus 6.2

   Weight

   140 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. 6.2 6.3 in · 19:9 About 99.1 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. N81 2.4 in · 4:3 About 17.8 cm² rectangular area

6.2 has approximately 455.4% more rectangular screen area than N81.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.