Nokia 6.2 vs O2 Cosmo

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightCosmo: 50 g lighterCosmo: 130 g · 6.2: 180 g
• WidthCosmo: 13.1 mm narrowerCosmo: 62 mm · 6.2: 75.1 mm
• Screen diagonalCosmo: 3.9 in smaller diagonalCosmo: 2.4 in · 6.2: 6.3 in
• ChipsetQualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 (14 nm) / TI OMAP 8506.2: Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 (14 nm) · Cosmo: TI OMAP 850
• Rear camera layoutTriple / Single6.2: Triple · Cosmo: Single
• Depth6.2: 4.7 mm thinner6.2: 8.3 mm · Cosmo: 13 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 6.2

   Height

   159.9 mm

   Width

   75.1 mm

   Depth

   8.3 mm

   Weight

   180 g

2. 2. Cosmo

   Height

   111 mm

   Width

   62 mm

   Depth

   13 mm

   Weight

   130 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.