Nokia 6.2 vs Xolo Q2000

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width6.2: 2.7 mm narrower6.2: 75.1 mm · Q2000: 77.8 mm
• Screen diagonalQ2000: 0.8 in smaller diagonalQ2000: 5.5 in · 6.2: 6.3 in
• ChipsetQualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 (14 nm) / Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm)6.2: Qualcomm SDM636 Snapdragon 636 (14 nm) · Q2000: Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm)
• Rear camera layoutTriple / Single6.2: Triple · Q2000: Single
• Depth6.2: 1.5 mm thinner6.2: 8.3 mm · Q2000: 9.8 mm
• HeightQ2000: 3.9 mm shorterQ2000: 156 mm · 6.2: 159.9 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 6.2

   Height

   159.9 mm

   Width

   75.1 mm

   Depth

   8.3 mm

   Weight

   180 g

2. 2. Q2000

   Height

   156 mm

   Width

   77.8 mm

   Depth

   9.8 mm

   Weight

   180 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.