Nokia 6290 vs Sonim XP6

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight6290: 155 g lighter6290: 115 g · XP6: 270 g
• Width6290: 14.5 mm narrower6290: 50 mm · XP6: 64.5 mm
• Screen diagonal6290: 0.43 in smaller diagonal6290: 2.2 in · XP6: 2.63 in
• Height6290: 43 mm shorter6290: 94 mm · XP6: 137 mm
• Release year2006 / 20146290: 2006 · XP6: 2014

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 6290

   Height

   94 mm

   Width

   50 mm

   Depth

   20.8 mm

   Weight

   115 g

2. 2. XP6

   Height

   137 mm+43 mm versus 6290

   Width

   64.5 mm+14.5 mm versus 6290

   Depth

   20.5 mm

   Weight

   270 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. 6290 2.2 in · 4:3 About 15 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. XP6 2.63 in · 4:3 About 21.4 cm² rectangular area

XP6 has approximately 42.9% more rectangular screen area than 6290.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.