Nokia 6620 vs Nokia N72

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width

  N72: 5 mm narrower

  6620:

  58 mm

  N72:

  53 mm

• Chipset

  6620:

  TI OMAP 1510

  N72:

  TI OMAP 1710

• Depth

  N72: 2.2 mm thinner

  6620:

  24 mm

  N72:

  21.8 mm

• Release year

  6620:

  2004

  N72:

  2006

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 6620

   Height:

   109 mm

   Width:

   58 mm +5 mm versus N72

   Depth:

   24 mm +2.2 mm versus N72

2. 2. N72

   Height:

   109 mm

   Width:

   53 mm

   Depth:

   21.8 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. 6620

   6620: Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting.

2. 2. N72

   N72: Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.