Nokia 6630 vs Nokia N72

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthN72: 7 mm narrowerN72: 53 mm · 6630: 60 mm
• Depth6630: 0.8 mm thinner6630: 21 mm · N72: 21.8 mm
• Release year2004 / 20066630: 2004 · N72: 2006

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 6630

   Height

   110 mm

   Width

   60 mm+7 mm versus N72

   Depth

   21 mm

   Weight

   127 g

2. 2. N72

   Height

   109 mm

   Width

   53 mm

   Depth

   21.8 mm+0.8 mm versus 6630

   Weight

   124 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

At least two phones need compatible screen dimensions for a drawing.

1. 1. 6630 Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting
2. 2. N72 Screen geometry unavailable or conflicting

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.