Nokia 702T vs ZTE Boost MAX+

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight702T: 67.8 g lighter702T: 127 g · Boost MAX+: 194.8 g
• Width702T: 22.2 mm narrower702T: 60.4 mm · Boost MAX+: 82.6 mm
• Screen diagonal702T: 3.24 in smaller diagonal702T: 2.46 in · Boost MAX+: 5.7 in
• Height702T: 48 mm shorter702T: 117.1 mm · Boost MAX+: 165.1 mm
• Release year2011 / 2015702T: 2011 · Boost MAX+: 2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 702T

   Height

   117.1 mm

   Width

   60.4 mm

   Depth

   10 mm

   Weight

   127 g

2. 2. Boost MAX+

   Height

   165.1 mm+48 mm versus 702T

   Width

   82.6 mm+22.2 mm versus 702T

   Depth

   10.2 mm

   Weight

   194.8 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. 702T 2.46 in · 4:3 About 18.7 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Boost MAX+ 5.7 in · 16:9 About 89.6 cm² rectangular area

Boost MAX+ has approximately 377.9% more rectangular screen area than 702T.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.