Nokia 7.2 vs TECNO Camon CX

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightCamon CX: 30 g lighterCamon CX: 150 g · 7.2: 180 g
• Screen diagonalCamon CX: 0.8 in smaller diagonalCamon CX: 5.5 in · 7.2: 6.3 in
• ChipsetQualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) / Mediatek MT6750T (28 nm)7.2: Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) · Camon CX: Mediatek MT6750T (28 nm)
• Rear camera layoutTriple / Single7.2: Triple · Camon CX: Single
• DepthCamon CX: 2.7 mm thinnerCamon CX: 5.6 mm · 7.2: 8.3 mm
• HeightCamon CX: 7.1 mm shorterCamon CX: 152.8 mm · 7.2: 159.9 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 7.2

   Height

   159.9 mm

   Width

   75.2 mm

   Depth

   8.3 mm

   Weight

   180 g

2. 2. Camon CX

   Height

   152.8 mm

   Width

   75.8 mm

   Depth

   5.6 mm

   Weight

   150 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• Studio C 8+8 LTE vs Camon CX