Nokia 801T vs Oppo A12e

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width801T: 10.6 mm narrower801T: 65 mm · A12e: 75.6 mm
• Screen diagonal801T: 2.2 in smaller diagonal801T: 4 in · A12e: 6.2 in
• Rear camera layoutSingle / Dual801T: Single · A12e: Dual
• DepthA12e: 4.6 mm thinnerA12e: 8.2 mm · 801T: 12.8 mm
• Height801T: 31 mm shorter801T: 125.2 mm · A12e: 156.2 mm
• Release year2011 / 2020801T: 2011 · A12e: 2020

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 801T

   Height

   125.2 mm

   Width

   65 mm

   Depth

   12.8 mm+4.6 mm versus A12e

   Weight

   170 g

2. 2. A12e

   Height

   156.2 mm+31 mm versus 801T

   Width

   75.6 mm+10.6 mm versus 801T

   Depth

   8.2 mm

   Weight

   168 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. 801T 4 in · 16:9 About 44.1 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. A12e 6.2 in · 19:9 About 95.9 cm² rectangular area

A12e has approximately 117.5% more rectangular screen area than 801T.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.