Nokia C1 vs Philips T939

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightC1: 84.5 g lighterC1: 155 g · T939: 239.5 g
• WidthT939: 13.6 mm narrowerT939: 57.8 mm · C1: 71.4 mm
• Screen diagonalT939: 2.25 in smaller diagonalT939: 3.2 in · C1: 5.45 in
• DepthC1: 13.3 mm thinnerC1: 8.7 mm · T939: 22 mm
• HeightT939: 37.6 mm shorterT939: 110 mm · C1: 147.6 mm
• Release year2019 / 2013C1: 2019 · T939: 2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. C1

   Height

   147.6 mm+37.6 mm versus T939

   Width

   71.4 mm+13.6 mm versus T939

   Depth

   8.7 mm

   Weight

   155 g

2. 2. T939

   Height

   110 mm

   Width

   57.8 mm

   Depth

   22 mm+13.3 mm versus C1

   Weight

   239.5 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. C1 5.45 in · 18:9 About 76.7 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. T939 3.2 in · 5:3 About 29.1 cm² rectangular area

C1 has approximately 163% more rectangular screen area than T939.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.