Nokia C5 vs Oppo R5

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightC5: 65.7 g lighterC5: 89.3 g · R5: 155 g
• WidthC5: 28.5 mm narrowerC5: 46 mm · R5: 74.5 mm
• Screen diagonalC5: 3 in smaller diagonalC5: 2.2 in · R5: 5.2 in
• DepthR5: 7.4 mm thinnerR5: 4.9 mm · C5: 12.3 mm
• HeightC5: 36.9 mm shorterC5: 112 mm · R5: 148.9 mm
• Release year2010 / 2014C5: 2010 · R5: 2014

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. C5

   Height

   112 mm

   Width

   46 mm

   Depth

   12.3 mm+7.4 mm versus R5

   Weight

   89.3 g

2. 2. R5

   Height

   148.9 mm+36.9 mm versus C5

   Width

   74.5 mm+28.5 mm versus C5

   Depth

   4.9 mm

   Weight

   155 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. C5 2.2 in · 4:3 About 15 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. R5 5.2 in · 16:9 About 74.5 cm² rectangular area

R5 has approximately 397.3% more rectangular screen area than C5.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.